VideoGen vs InVideo (2026)
Detailed side-by-side comparison of VideoGen and InVideo. See which AI video generator fits your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | VideoGen | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| AI Text-to-Video | ||
| Template Library | ||
| Ease of Use | Very Easy | Easy |
| AI Focus | High | Medium |
| Traditional Editing | Basic | Advanced |
| YouTube Shorts Optimized | ||
| Faceless Video Support | ||
| 4K Export | ||
| Starting Price | $12/month | $15/month |
| Best For Quick Content | ||
| Best For Advanced Editing |
VideoGen Pros & Cons
VideoGen Pros
- ✓More AI-focused workflow
- ✓Faster for quick content creation
- ✓Better for beginners
- ✓Optimized for YouTube Shorts
- ✓Strong faceless video features
VideoGen Cons
- ✗Less traditional editing features
- ✗Fewer templates than InVideo
- ✗Smaller user base
InVideo Pros & Cons
InVideo Pros
- ✓Huge template library
- ✓More traditional editing tools
- ✓Better for complex edits
- ✓Established platform
- ✓Strong brand customization
InVideo Cons
- ✗Less AI-focused
- ✗Can be slower for quick content
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗More complex interface
Which Should You Choose?
Choose VideoGen if:
- You want fast AI-powered video generation
- You're creating YouTube Shorts or social media content
- You prefer a simpler, more AI-focused workflow
- You're a beginner or want minimal learning curve
- You need faceless video creation features
Choose InVideo if:
- You want extensive templates and traditional editing
- You need more control over video editing
- You're comfortable with complex interfaces
- You need advanced brand customization
- You want access to a larger template library
Bottom line: VideoGen is better for quick, AI-driven content creation, while InVideo excels at traditional video editing with AI assistance. Your choice depends on your workflow preferences and specific needs.